• NEW USERS: If you haven't received your Confirmation Email: There has been an ongoing issue with the forum's send mail function and many new users haven't received the email to confirm their registration. I've done my best to manually process these, so there's a good chance if you've signed up in the past 30 days that you've already been validated and can proceed with posting on the forum (don't forget to introduce yourself!). If you still can't get in, please use the Contact Us link on the bottom of any page to send me a message and I'll process you manually. Thanks for your patience! ~Jerk

Will used older style Himalayans flood the market after the much improved Himalayan arrives ?

tom_d

Well travelled
Location
US
Since the Himalayan came out in the US, it has seemed that interest in all things Royal Enfield has only increased and turn around a negative narrative of previous models, the 650 twins furthered that as did the 350 platforms. I suspect this new one will bring additional attention Royal Enfield's way and give a new halo effect which may help keep the old Himalayan popular even as more eventually hit the used market.
 

nmroadrunner

Well travelled
Location
New Mexico, USA
Some will want the latest and greatest right away so bargains may be had while a larger percentage will take an wait-and-see approach as to reliability and durability.
I think it highly unlikely the used market will be "flooded" with 411s for the forseeable future.
Dealers will most certainly be providing incentives on remaining 2023 and older "new" unsold 411s to make showroom floor space.
 

Scott Free

Well travelled
Location
Ill-Annoy
It will be at least six months to a year before the 452 arrives on these shores. And while there will no doubt be some early adopters willing to pay full list and then some for it, I suspect there are a lot more who will hold onto their 411s for a year or two to see how the 452 holds up in the real world. That should prevent any spectacular drop in 411 trade/resale values. Or so I hope, having just spent $1400 getting mine back on the road.
 

Scott Free

Well travelled
Location
Ill-Annoy
Funny thing happened a few weeks ago. I went for a dirt road/paved highway ride with two buddies. One on a Aprilia 660 Toureg (sp?); the other on a 1250 GS.

Needless to say on the pavement I couldn't stay up. After that ride I decided to look at some upgraded (faster) bikes.

The 452 Himmy looks great on paper. But that CF Moto 450 MT looks even better with a couple more ponies too.
Keep in mind the CF Moto is a parallel twin, and the engine (in NK model currently available at my local dealer) makes its peak torque at 7600 rpm. Going to be a whole different experience from either of the Himalayas.
 

smilespergallon

Well travelled
Location
Durham, NC
Higher peak numbers are not always better or faster. 'Area under the curve' is what you want to look at for how any engine performs in day to day variable use. You will so seldom hit the near-redline revs required for those numbers that it is much more important to know how much of the rev range gives you usable power (power band), and how much power it gives at various points in the range (the curve).

Wider bands and higher peak both contribute to area under the curve, but unless you are hot lapping on a track day the chances are high that you're going to be more interested in how much it gives you from low down to about 3/4 of the way up (and how wide that range is) instead of how just much it gives in the top 10% of your tach.
 

excollier

Well travelled
Location
Ireland
Higher peak numbers are not always better or faster. 'Area under the curve' is what you want to look at for how any engine performs in day to day variable use. You will so seldom hit the near-redline revs required for those numbers that it is much more important to know how much of the rev range gives you usable power (power band), and how much power it gives at various points in the range (the curve).

Wider bands and higher peak both contribute to area under the curve, but unless you are hot lapping on a track day the chances are high that you're going to be more interested in how much it gives you from low down to about 3/4 of the way up (and how wide that range is) instead of how just much it gives in the top 10% of your tach.
Put simply, mid range rules....
 

Overdrive

Well travelled
Staff member
Location
Southern UK
From what I’ve read, although the 450mt uses the same 270 degree crank, twin cylinder engine as the road going cf Moto models, it has been re tuned to produce more torque lower down in the rev range, and as a consequence produces less peak power - about 40hp as opposed to 44.
It’s certainly one I’m going to look at, along with the 450 Himalayan.
 

Roy Gavin

Well travelled
As Phil Vincent said a long time ago, the ability to get to a high speed quickly is more use on a road bike than a slightly higher speed.
And we are left to wonder how much longer his bikes would have held the world naked bike speed record if they had actually been made to go fast!
FWIW they held it for 60 years, lost it by 1 MPH to a bike that claimed around 100HP more!
But most power/ weight claims prove to be total fiction when they are independently tested for approval for learner/ restricted compliance at 200HP/ TON, wet/ RWHP, some bikes actually having to make the same HP as the manufacturer claim KW to comply.
And no, road testers never notice-------!
 

Flicka

Well travelled
Location
Italy
Take a
Funny thing happened a few weeks ago. I went for a dirt road/paved highway ride with two buddies. One on a Aprilia 660 Toureg (sp?); the other on a 1250 GS.

Needless to say on the pavement I couldn't stay up. After that ride I decided to look at some upgraded (faster) bikes.

The 452 Himmy looks great on paper. But that CF Moto 450 MT looks even better with a couple more ponies too.
look at the mileage of the CF moto.
 
Top Bottom